The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker (talk) 21:38, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sunny Bai[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be self-promotional. A quick Google search does not show this person's notability, and I find the claims in the article questionable. Without these questionable claims, there is no notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 21:56, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Sven Manguard Wha? 06:29, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
While a couple of sources have now been added, they fall short of demonstrating that he's the subject of enough media coverage to get past WP:GNG — one of the two is a 75-word blurb, and the other one, while more substantial, is not enough to get him past GNG by itself. I'm willing to reconsider if the sourcing can be beefed up a lot more than this, but it has to be deleted if one substantive article is the best we can do for sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Content is predominently self promotion, thereby failing GNG. The article on Bai's company, Blenz Coffee, is itself unreferenced indicating an all round notability issue. ► Philg88 ◄ ^♦talk 05:11, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.