The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 03:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sunnydale High Yearbook[edit]

Sunnydale High Yearbook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:NBOOK Chris Troutman (talk) 00:46, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

[1] footnotes omitted from quote.
Negative review in EW.
Enduring coverage via a 20th anniversary article mention: "Additionally there’s a “Sunnydale High Yearbook Contest” across the country where the grand prize is a trip to San Diego for Comic Con. All fans have to do is upload their high school class photos to Twitter and Facebook with their best Buffy caption in the form of a “senior quote.”" THR.
Overall WP:NBOOK #1 is met. Jclemens (talk) 22:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Comment - I don't think that last source is about this book - its about a contest that occurred on social media in 2017, and the book that this article is about was released in 1999. That first source is also very short on actual coverage on the book - the part you quoted is basically the entirety of the coverage in the entire paper on the book, which I don't believe is WP:SIGCOV. Rorshacma (talk) 16:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    This is probably correct, but if we are going to cover successive references to a fictional yearbook from a rather popular high-school-based (well, at least the first three seasons) show, this is where it would go. That is, even if this aspect of the topic isn't covered by the current article that focuses only on the specific tie-in product, it would be covered in a thoroughly complete encyclopedia article by this title. Jclemens (talk) 04:03, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 08:55, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Excellent ping. I know of no editor who is better able to find RS book reviews: if it's there, Cunard can find it. Jclemens (talk) 06:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you for the ping and the kind words. Cunard (talk) 10:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.