The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Super angel[edit]

Super angel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to angel investor. Not enough in reliable sources to justify a separate article. Edwardx (talk) 16:21, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:23, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 18:23, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and misguided nomination. There are dozens of citations in the article, and thousands if not tens of thousands overall, many describing what these investors are and what makes them different from angel investors. Super angel investors are generally not angel investors: they are professional investors and often invest other people's money. I think the mistake comes from a hasty assumption that a "super" angel a type of regular angel but towards the large size. It is a distinct, well-defined, agreed-to class of Silicon Valley investor and, as such, a separate and non-overlapping subject. Just like "big data" versus data or "Big Bird" versus bird. - Wikidemon (talk) 22:47, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Notable per Wikidemon. Satisfies GNG due to coverage in the sources listed in the article and elsewhere. James500 (talk) 19:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Wikidemon. It's a distinct thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pegnawl (talk • contribs) 20:31, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Angel investor -- Merge content. No reason it can't just be a subsection while retaining the same information.Past Bedtime ^{[no sleep]} 21:53, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Pass WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV - Dont see the point why it is nominated. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:25, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.