The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 08:47, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Susie Carmichael[edit]

Susie Carmichael (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete or Merge. I don't see anywhere of more than one character in SpongeBob SquarePants or The Fairly OddParents having their own pages. If the result is merge, merge to List of Rugrats characters. Marcus2 (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete because it'll likely get undone by a slobbering fanboy if redirected. There are no out of universe sources for the character. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:47, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • A redirect can be protected to prevent that. -- Banjeboi 03:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to a list of Rugrats characters. This and the other nominations around it all belong in a list of Rugrats characters (as many movies, movie series, and TV series have such lists. I don't see why Rugrats wouldn't qualify for such a list).Tyrenon (talk) 20:23, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and add sourcing an commentary. Merge as a last resort, it seems large enough for a standalone article. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 20:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete then redirect to the List of Rugrats characters. Entirely in-universe plot-summary content fork. This fictional entity has no separate notability from its work of fiction in the universe that matters here -- the realityverse.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is little sense to deleting if you are redirecting. The history may prove useful so simply redirecting would achieve the same unless there is some history that needs to be banished for some reason. -- Banjeboi 03:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep In the new series, she is in the majority of episodes. She has appeared in the previous series, and all of the movies, although briefly. She has enough information to warrant her own article. Dream Focus 01:52, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Most of these are notable, and some aren't. I don't have the time, inclination, or lexisnexis account needed to turn them into GAs, but it's possible. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 05:40, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.