The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is sources don't meet requirements to establish notability Star Mississippi 18:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Swaran Ghar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Swaran Ghar

Article about television series that has no Reception section and no independent significant coverage. An article should speak for itself and tell why the subject is notable. This article only says that the series exists. It was moved from article space to draft space as needing better sourcing, and was then promptly recreated in article space. The reviewer was correct in moving it to draft space, because the references are not independent and secondary, and because there is no Reception section.

Reference Number	Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	filmibeat.com	Interview with actress	No	Not about series		No
2	msn.com	Puff piece about two actors	No	Yes	Yes	No

Maybe there is independent significant coverage. This article is not that coverage. This copy should be deleted from article space because there already is a draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - with improved sources. I found some more sources about the television series, such as a review by TellyChakkar ([1]) and Pinkvilla ([2]). There is also an interview with lead actor Ajay Singh Chaudhary on Times of India ([3]). There is enough coverage to keep. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 18:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:ICTFSOURCES seems helpful for source assessment, e.g. The following should not be considered reliable sources. [...] Filmibeat.com [...] Tellychakkar.com [...]. I also found several interviews, but these do not have independent content to help support notability: producer Ravi Dubey (India Today, Feb. 25, 2022), star Sangita Ghosh (News18/MSN, Feb. 28, 2022), star Ronit Roy (PTI/The Print, Feb. 27, 2022), Ghosh (The Tribune, Jan. 11, 2022), Ghosh (TOI, Mar. 1, 2022). The series began on 28 Feb. 2022, and there does not yet appear to be sufficient independent and secondary coverage to support an article. Beccaynr (talk) 03:28, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As per nom, the article depends on PR/spam/paid links. Lacking significant coverage. Jeni Wolf (talk) 05:48, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.