The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of She-Ra: Princess of Power and She-Ra and the Princesses of Power characters#Swift Wind. Tone 11:08, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Swift Wind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Let's get this out there first: it is a horse with no speaking role. Sigh. Anyway. The usual: the coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. PROD removed by a WP:SPA using edit summary "Laughable! This is an important article!" who is clearly not here to WP:BTE (90% of edits of this account are limited to PRO template removals). Anyway, as I said above, the sources are very poor, plot summaries in niche listings of characters, etc. And yes, the current article cites an encyclopedia: [1], but as you can see following the link to Amazon preview (which may require signing in, but it is free, I mean, who doesn't have an Amazon account...), that character (animal...) doesn't have a dedicared entry, it just merits a passing plot summary mention (no analysis) in the entry for She-Ra. I can't think of anything better to do here than to redirect this to List of He-Man and the Masters of the Universe characters. It was a cute entry while it lasted here, I guess? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Assertions of WP:ITSIMPORTANT, WP:ITSNOTABLE, etc. are not a very good argument. The WP:SPA above copy-pasted the same argument to all the AfDs in which they used the same dePROD summary. Try again. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.