The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 19:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney James Harcourt[edit]

Sydney James Harcourt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being an understudy for a show, even one as popular as Hamilton, is not even close to being notable. JDDJS (talk) 23:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He also originated one of the smaller roles aside from being an understudy for the major ones. Ausir (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The role he originated is an extremely minor role that only appears in one scene, and he is still considered just to be an ensemble member. In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexi Lawson (2nd nomination) it was agreed that being a replacement wasn't enough for notability. If a replacement isn't enough, understudy isn't even close to enough. JDDJS (talk) 19:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 01:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 01:23, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.