The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Syed B. Ali

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the coverage seems to be about Cavium. No significant coverage for him. Fails WP:GNG. Alternatively, redirect for search purpose. Störm (talk) 18:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not LinkedIn.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:44, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:29, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- notability is not inherited from the company, and there's nothing else there. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.