The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 22:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Moiz Balkhi

[edit]
Syed Moiz Balkhi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is lacking significant coverage as all mentioned add little to his notability. Some are tabloid so not reliable. Then, if his site is notable then we should have article on his site. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 05:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 05:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 05:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 05:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 05:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Don't know which guidline you are following, authoring article on different sites adds nothing towards notability. Störm (talk) 14:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But where is significant coverage in WP:RS enough to write a piece of article? Störm (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do you really think we should consider this interview done by a unreliable source. I can not verify the claims (Top 100 entrepreneurs under the age of 30" by the United Nations) from a RS. --Saqib (talk) 06:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.