The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted G11, with current title deleted G8. (non-admin closure) feminist 09:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

T. E. Abinesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:BIO, promotional tone Kleuske (talk) 08:16, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:22, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 03:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- basically spam. Part of a walled garden created by Special:Contributions/Praveenkumar.m89 which also includes Abi & Abi Pictures. No independent sourcing; all I see is PR-driven coverage or passing mentions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.