The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. In view of limited participation, this is a SOFTDELETE - as with a PROD, the article will be restored on request, though it may then be renominated. JohnCD (talk) 21:01, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TK-N-CASH

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe it fails the notability requirement for a music group with no significant, non-trivial, reliable sources MacAddct1984 ^{(talk  contribs)} 21:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Author believed it qualified under 4 and 5 for the WP:NMG. I left my reasoning on the talk page. -- MacAddct1984 ^{(talk  contribs)} 22:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I cannot find any third-party source about this group and, as you rightly say, the three mixtapes do not qualify as major albums. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 11:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:56, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.