The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tables of thermophysical properties of R134a[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOT the place for pages full of statistics. While such tables for the most common elements may be acceptable, having it for every material out there seems like serious overkill, something better suited for another Wikisite perhaps? Fram (talk) 10:11, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Lists. Fram (talk) 10:11, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too technical for wikipedia, this is basically a list of numbers. Anyone needing such info would turn to a specialized reference, not wikipedia. Oaktree b (talk) 15:59, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Regasrdless of the substance considered, quoting between 5 and 12 data points across over 360 conditions falls well into WP:NOTSTATS territory. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:49, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DELREASON#14: Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia. Specifically, WP:NOTSTATS. TompaDompa (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.