The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as a subpage of Tachyon. I have not merged due to the argument that it seems to work better as a subpage -- Samir धर्म 06:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article violates WP:NOR and WP:RS Whispering^(talk/c) 00:25, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Alvin6226 ^talk 00:31, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

*delete per nom. ~ c. tales \\tk// 00:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge Into Tachyons . merge only the more notable sources as trivia. --Ageo020 00:58, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• merge per Ageo. ~ c. tales \\tk// 01:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• [after edit conflict] Delete outright. This just...isn't really even interesting enough for a merge. I think Tachyons#Tachyons_in_fiction really covers it well enough; we don't have a big list of fictional uses of plasma, for example. But if others think it would add to the article, go ahead and merge. -Elmer Clark 01:09, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete 50% original research, 50% List of uses of the word "tachyons" in fiction. --IslaySolomon 02:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Sounds like a vote for cleanup and moving the page to List of instance of tachyons in fiction. hateless 22:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment While I think that would be a more accurate title, I'm sticking by my delete vote. There's already a tachyons in fiction section in the article tachyons and I really don't think Wikipedia needs yet another obscure fan-list. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --IslaySolomon 11:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please note that the 'Tachyons in fiction' section in the main tachyons page was the original location of this list, before it was moved to the current page. [1] The entry currently residing there was copied back to that page by me, to serve as a summary for this article. [2] Mike Peel 12:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - and do not merge. Merging would degrade the quality of the Tachyon article by making the bulk of it a hodge podge list of occurences of the word tachyon. -- Whpq 14:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Bucketsofg✐ 16:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Move — to List of uses of the word 'tachyons' in fiction, although the OR/POV should be cleaned up. This is otherwise a serviceable list. I didn't find it that interesting either, but such things are subjective and not really a reason to delete. JChap2007 19:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge into Tachyons — Some of the points in the article aren't that notable, but most are. Remove non-notable points post/pre-move. Keep the points in a 'Tachyons in fiction' section, not a trivia section (as per WP:TRIVIA). Note that this article was recently (16 August 2006) split from Tachyons by Pjacobi (talk • contribs). Mike Peel 20:33, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep/merge per Mike Peel. hateless 22:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep/merge as above. Hornplease 05:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or delete. Do not merge with Tachyon article - this cruft was removed from there recently. It is quite useful practice to put the "popular culture" references into a leaf article so they do not pollute the main article (see Gorilla). Knowing how fast people would infest the Tachyon again I would suggest keep. It makes no harm and kids have convenient place to play. Pavel Vozenilek 21:03, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.