The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. None of the reasons mentioned are sufficient to establish notability and the sole keep !vote did not provide any substantial reasons. So Why 09:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talat Wizarat

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real notability. Fails WP:NACADEMICS and WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 08:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 08:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 08:57, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Three books, researcher, founding member, chairperson, PhD, MA, commentator. Seems notable enough to be on Wikipedia. sikander (talk) 20:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

having a PhD and MA is not a criteria for notability. LibStar (talk) 04:02, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails WP:PROF. not a noted leader in their field. only award mentioned is Fulbright scholar, which is handed out to thousands every year. LibStar (talk) 04:03, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Far WP:Too soon] to pass WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 12:19, 14 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.