The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No objections to renomination. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:54, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talei Burns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Poorly sourced WP:BLP of a musician with no particularly strong claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC. Except for one news article in a reliable source, the referencing here is otherwise entirely of the Blogspotty-Youtubey-Facebooky variety, which is not acceptable sourcing -- and one news article isn't enough to get a person over WP:GNG by itself. As always, a musician is not entitled to a Wikipedia article just because she exists; RS coverage must be present to verify an NMUSIC pass, but nothing here passes NMUSIC and the sourcing isn't solid enough. Bearcat (talk) 00:50, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:53, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete- as no WP:RS source has in depth coverage. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 04:05, 22 August 2016 (UTC) striking confirmed sockpuppet Atlantic306 (talk) 03:31, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.