The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talia Chiarelli[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not too familiar with Wiki's guidelines, but I do see the questionable notability here. No doubt this article was written in good faith and this young woman has had wonderful accomplishments, but not sure it merits a page. She's a college athlete that has had success in international competitions, but nothing exceptional (yet!). Perhaps her page can be merged with her team's page?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexis8780 (talk • contribs)

Delete per nominator. 2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D (talk) 01:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Kaleopi318 applied the AfD tag but did no further followup. Alexis8780 opened the discussion on this page, but the ((afd2)) template was not applied and this page was never transcluded to a daily log. I have fixed these things, but next time please fully follow the procedures at WP:AFDHOWTO. I offer no comment on the nomination itself at this time. --Finngall ^talk 22:13, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. DeviantAttitude (talk) 22:18, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 22:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. --Finngall ^talk 22:19, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A search here showed a few mentions, and there is an in-depth treatment here, a mention here, some coverage here, and getting an honor here, and a mention in the Boston Globe and a second mention here, and in-depth coverage here and her photo here. Meets the WP:GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No matter where she goes, the local coverage follows her. She's been covered by good sources in Michigan, Boston, and Ottawa. She's made a national tournament, been in the top 12 in Canada, and got 2nd place team and 13th place individual in an international event. I suppose there may be even more sources and evidence to support notability, but I've seen enough to pass GNG. -- RM 03:17, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.