The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buff bills 7701 22:03, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tanghalang Ateneo

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable university theater group. Such groups are not inherently notable, and this one doesn't seem to pass the GNG. Drmies (talk) 03:20, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:25, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep After research, this 35 year old theater group passes our general notability guidelines. This is just a sampling of the major press outlets, etc, that have covered the theater and its work: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] SarahStierch (talk) 17:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:22, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per SarahStierch. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 16:53, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment and Keep As noted the theater group is notable enough but the article needs cleaning it doesn't sound like a encyclopedia and sounds like a promotion. The article may need some copy-editing, it seems that the whole article maybe copy-pasted.--Hariboneagle927 (talk) 07:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.