The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tania Fiolleau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence or reliable sourcing to establish notability. Kelly ^hi! 16:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jbh^Talk 21:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender -related deletion discussions. Jbh^Talk 21:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Probably another article created in the creepy web of Tara Teng worship. Only apparent claim to "notability" was meeting Tara Teng. AusLondonder (talk) 21:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Just because she crossed paths with the unduly ubiquitous Tara Teng doesn't confer automatic non-notability. Let's see what gets dug up with the other articles on RCMPs and other Canadian law enforcement officials working to stop human trafficking. Montanabw^(talk) 23:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no coverage outside of Ontario. VERY CREEPY. This sentence in particular: "She thereby entered the sex industry and became a famous Madam married to the Mafia" - how is this encyclopedic in tone? Sounds the teaser to a Skinemax movie!!! —Мандичка^YO 😜 18:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Creepily written article on non-notable person that only seems to have been created because of her connections to Tara Teng; others put it well as well. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment she has had some press as an advocate, but the article is seriously bad. If she is notable it should have a section on her falling into prostitution and becoming a madam. Then a section on her advocacy. I'm tempted to TNT it which would allow someone to recreate and write a proper article. Legacypac (talk) 17:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• I think what's "creepy" is the endless recitations of how "creepy" the article creator has been, insinuating the most lurid interpretations for what he's done. We know that he was a prostitution abolitionist and that was his interest in creating these articles. Enough already. Sometimes the creepiness you see is your own. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.