The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The worthless nomination notwithstanding. T. Canens (talk) 06:47, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Pylavets

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I realize we permit non-english language sources, but every source on this page is in Hebrew. Granted I am a bit of a deletionist, but I see nothing in this page that suggests this person is notable. NYC.Geek (talk) 16:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now - It is a borderline case though, but the article has secondary sources from some major publications. However, the subject of the article has not been in the media more recently so it would be worth watching. Incidentally the article itself has been nominated by NYC.Geek, as an apparent response to an editor's questions about his use of sockpuppets and potential conflict of interest with an article on Steven Strauss he had created. Avaya1 (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:12, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott (talk) 02:40, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 08:59, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete While my Hebrew ability is paltry (the first source only says “16 year old Tanya Filovitz and 19-year-old Noam Frost, who were among Xnet's promising models last year.”; the second source does nothing—it’s just an assortment of landscape photos!!! The third source is an interview about her dream jobs and role models... not what she has done. And the 4th just has a picture of her at a beach. Useless. 5th doesn’t even mention her at all. ), what I could find in English does nothing to contribute to notability. Not even the godforsaken Fashion Model Directory has anything at all to offer besides her existence. The notability template is accurate here. Trillfendi (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON perhaps This subject is not notable per Trillfendi Lubbad85 (☎) 03:13, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Trill. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 18:57, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.