The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tanya Reed

[edit]
Tanya Reed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable publicist. We do have articles for her notable client, Digital Pipeline / Computers 4 Africa, The references n the article are almost entirely to her clients. DGG ( talk ) 11:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. sst 12:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. sst 12:32, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:36, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.