The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Absolutely no reasons put forward why this is not a standard news item in a violent part of the world. No continuing news coverage past the couple of days after the event. This,as pointed out, is what WikiNews is for. Black Kite 01:27, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tapuah junction stabbing[edit]

Tapuah junction stabbing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Why is this stabbing notable? Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Jmundo (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These types of attacks? Wikipedia is really claiming that an attack on a soldier in occupied territory is a "terrorist" attack? Interesting. nableezy - 02:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Really? Then why do all the sources come from within 1 day of the incident (every source is from either the 10th or the 11th of Feb)? nableezy - 18:56, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Random citizen? A soldier in occupied territory is a random citizen? nableezy - 03:26, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. I see now that the man driving the car was a soldier. I thought he was a civilian driver. Nevertheless, this was not combat. It was an unprovoked attack on a man who was driving his car. By a police chief. That is unusual, notable, and shocking.AMuseo (talk) 04:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.