The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, consensus is that the article does meet the relevant notability guideline. Davewild (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Taraneh Javanbakht[edit]

Taraneh Javanbakht (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)(delete) – (View log)

Non-notable person failing WP:BIO. Not verifiable by third party sources.Aparhizi (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep A google search shows a few possible(?) RS such as 1. If kept, the article needs to be cleaned up. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 21:51, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, very weak if any claim to notability, no verification from reliable sources. No prejudice if sources are found. Deiz talk 22:29, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• 'Delete'Neutral Not notable at least as a scientist. No papers in Web of Science. Unless someone can show the poetry books are notable in Iran, she isnt notable. DGG (talk) 01:19, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Her notability is based on her poetry and story books (not as a scientist) and there is some notable media coverage on her work. Alefbe (talk) 17:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. The media coverage listed here appears to indicate notability. The article in the Arabic Wikipedia is just a stub. The German one includes a partial list of her books, which I added to the article. The English article doesn't have any link to a Farsi-language article. --Eastmain (talk) 06:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. There is substantial media coverage in Persian media (for example an interview with Radio Zamaneh and articles about her in Kayhan and Shargh). She has written several books and her collective body of work seems notable. Alefbe (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral :we had same debate on fawiki and we conclude to delete the article for this person.--Mardetanha ^talk 13:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 06:09, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep She is notable in Iran as a young poetess and writer who lives abroad. her numerous books has been published by a famous publisher. She has been interviewed by Jam-e-Jam, a high-circulating newspaper, and also by Radio Zamaneh. Many Internet websites have written about her. News of her works can be found in Shargh and Kayhan. User:Mardetanha's claim is not true. Her article in fawiki (Farsi Wikipedia) has been deleted without reaching Consensus and with only 2 votes in favor of deletion. This unacceptable deletion has been a matter of debate in Farsi Wikipedia. Mostafazizi (talk) 11:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. If what Alefbe sais about articles in RadioZamaneh, Shargh & Keyhan is right, Taraneh Javanbakht is notable and we should write her article in FarsiWikiPedia again.--Taranet (talk) 07:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. --Kaaveh (talk) 09:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.