The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tarang Singapore[edit]

Tarang Singapore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous AfD on this subject closed as no consensus due to lack of participation (only discussion was between me as the nominator and the article's creator); this is a speedy relisting as suggested by the closing admin. As indicated, this is an interuniversity event with no evidence of coverage from reliable sources. The only information appears to come from a primary source, i.e., an organization at one of the universities which sponsors the event. While one could argue this is a national event, only three schools participate, and there appears to be no coverage in any external publications (e.g., the Singapore Straits Times) to show how it meets WP:GNG. Kinu ^t/_c 02:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - While there are some videos of the performances here, I cant find any source covering the event. Nimuaq (talk) 09:25, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 22:32, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Non-notable event. Keb25 (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Detele. No significant coverage by reliable sources. - Yk (talk | contrib) 17:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.