The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tarl Warwick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the notability guidelines for people as there is no substantial coverage of them in independent, reliable sources. Nor WP:NAUTHOR because his books are self-published and not widely reviewed. Joe Roe (talk) 01:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete, no published sources and unimportant youtuber. JerrySa1 (talk) 02:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable YouTube performer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.