The result was delete. PhilKnight (talk) 20:29, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such genre as "technical metal". Some seem to be confusing a quality or trait of music with a true genre. As Leon Sword rightly said, any metal genre can be considered "technical": For thrash metal we have Artillery and Coroner; for power metal we have Symphony X or Wuthering Heights; for sludge metal we have Mastodon; for death metal we have Atheist; for progressive metal we have Dream Theater, and so on. Any subgenre can be technical. Technicality is not a genre, it is just a single quality that can apply to any real genre and says nothing about the music other than "It's technical". In addition to this, it is not a "genre" I have seen used or verified anywhere at all (note: it's used as a term, but not a genre). It has no logical reality, and no sources to back it up. A google search for the term turns up 97,500 hits, less than half that of "Battle metal". There is no good reason for this to exist as an article, it is quite simply and quite obviously just something someone has made up, as the lack of any source attests. Prophaniti (talk) 22:28, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]