The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as per unanimous consensus and no calls for deletion outside of the nominator. A non-admin closure. And Adoil Descended (talk) 12:20, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tedua[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NMUSIC. Kleuske (talk) 10:33, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:NMUSIC with the criteria of national charting albums and songs and he is signed to a notable label Sony Atlantic306 (talk) 11:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- For serious? Clear pass of WP:BAND criterion #2: "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." It seems that everything the guy releases charts in Italy per FIMI, which is a recommended chart for gauging notability per WP:CHART. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 13:38, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
keep per Atlantic306. JoshuaZ (talk) 15:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has no fewer than FOURTEEN songs in the current Italian top 50 singles chart [1] and the current number two album [2]. Richard3120 (talk) 19:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per 192.160.216.52, Atlantic306, and Richard3120. Tedua clearly passes WP:BAND. Kurtis ^(talk) 20:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per all of the above. Article needs expansion, not deletion; and the nominator probably ignored the WP:BEFORE process. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:44, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per the above, as has reliable sources indicating that it meets WP:NMUSIC criterion #2. This (somewhat) meets WP:SKCRIT #3. I agree that the draft could use better sourcing, but it is need of improvement, not deletion. The deletion rationale references WP:NMUSIC, so I am surprised that #2 would have been missed. This article should never have been nominated. Please do WP:BEFORE before nominating pages for deletion. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:42, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.