The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 21:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tehmeena

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was recently on AfD with no consensus, but having done a copyedit, there's nothing to substantiate anything in it that would meet GNG. It is highly likely that this is a vanity article with COI.

There was no source in the article that talked about her upbringing, family, athletic awards, or company as noted in the article. Much of the "sourcing" on the puffery words ("daring", "sexiest") were pic galleries with no substantiating content - one caption said "sexiest" was the subject's own claim, actually, so I removed that claim entirely. The first three hits on her are her site (not updated since 2012), her Twitter, and her Instagram. The Playboy thing seems to be nothing more than being Playboy's "Miss Social" at one point, but I've left it in there because it's locatable information. She doesn't seem to have been on the cover as many Indian sources claimed she was going to be. I think they may have misunderstood what the social contest was about, as there is nothing that even indicates she has ever even been in the magazine. MSJapan (talk) 20:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails GNG - the Hindi article has more sources and information (which is probably where the English version got its info) but it's not sufficient coverage. It seems she got some coverage posing for Playboy but it seems like flash in the pan to me —Мандичка^YO 😜 00:30, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 01:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A search turns up a lot more pictures of this starlet's rack on various blogs and porn mirrors than substantive coverage. (Come to that, I didn't find ANY substantive coverage.) Now if silicone queens are your cup of tea -- they aren't mine -- yay for you, but that doesn't qualify for a Wikipedia article. Nha Trang ^Allons! 16:22, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.