The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teknicks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable promotional article. Almost all the awards are utterly trivial -- awards for "fastest-growing" usually man not yet notable. Most of the refs are straight PR, eg. "Forbes spotlighted the company in a regional business insert" DGG ( talk ) 13:48, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:08, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found nothing to suggest solid notability here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 22:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:CORPBIO. Sources there currently are predominantly press releases or other primary and I'm not seeing sufficient others to justify keeping. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.