The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 22:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This forum does not appear to meet WP:WEB guidelines. Procedural listing, as speedy deletion has been contested. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent sources, just another website. HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 04:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The website is sometimes mentioned in the print media (source added to article). Pcorrick 07:19, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep its one of the more popular forums for electronic music in australia, even though it has minimal references right now, its had outside 3rd party coverage, although its alexa rating is only 201,148, its the most popular site in its category (Society > Subcultures > Rave > Regional > Oceania). It's also got a higher rating than all but the top 6 sites in the north america category, which makes sense if you consider the population differences between Australia and North America. I believe the site is notable, and the article just needs beefing up. ALKIVAR™☢ 19:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Nishkid64 19:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While it may be notable, notability is not established in the article so it should be deleted unless proper sources are provided. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The Way (talk • contribs) 01:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment. The article lists a source the Sydney Morning Herald. However, a search of Google News and Google News Archive came up empty so that appears to be the only available source from the media.
Weak Delete, notability not really asserted, but it looks as if it could be. I don't know enough about the subject to know how to go about doing that though. Lankiveil 03:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.