The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 04:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Television Style Awards[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Newly started PR stunt “award function” by a television production house with no notability. Fails WP:GNG. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:39, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per this; [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] - Ch an der 16:57, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do these gossip columns say? Can you tell us how it fits in our notability standards? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:57, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As a matter of policy, self-awarded awards should not be given serious treatment in an encyclopedia. There are no independent sources here to tell us these are legitimate. - Brianhe (talk) 18:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 07:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly Delete - as per nom, Sailor and Brianhe. Does not meet notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.