The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh 03:36, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible Three (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Delete stub about non-notable characters that do not merit their own article. This is in addition to the fact that the fact lacks proper sources for its assertions regarding which characters were combined (the issue mentioned does not explicitly say so); the fact that it involves OR, subjective interpretation about the alleged merging of these characters; the fact that it fails to point out that this is about fiction; and several other problems. Doczilla 06:58, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletions. —Hiding Talk 11:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a lot of concern has been raised about various Amalgam articles (as it was a series of one-shots with a lot of meta-fiction) and this is definitely one of the ones that highlights the issues - only appearing in someone else's comic, speculation/original research on the characters and a thin entry that has little chance of being expanded much without being pure plot. The team might be worth a mention here but that is about it. (Emperor 15:11, 12 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete per nom. Decoratrix 16:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Quasirandom 19:59, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Amalgam Comics itself deserves its own article, but only a small group of individual characters are notable enough outside of that subject to deserve their own articles. That group does not include these characters. Stephen Day 09:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.