The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thames Valley Magpies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could not establish that this is WP:NOTABLE Boleyn (talk) 08:04, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to AFL Britain. Can be verified to exist but I can't see any significant coverage, which is unsurprising for an Aussie rules team in the UK. Plausible search term though, so worth having a redirect. Jenks24 (talk) 10:17, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:16, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't think redirect to AFL Britain would be a good idea. It's a sports club notable enough, just because Aussie rules isn't a popular sport in England that should not mean it should be deleted, there's a plenty of clubs in Category:Australian rules football clubs in England
- Response What part of Wikipedia:Notability (sports) or WP:GNG do you think it meets? Boleyn (talk) 16:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  - Response to response - it's mentioned frequently when discussing the beginnings of Aussie rules in England, took a few seconds in a google search t find mentions of them ^[1] ^[2] ^[3] ^[4] ^[5], satisfying all of WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Some common sense has to be applied - just because the article is a stub doesn't mean it shouldn't exist, plus there's not a lot on the history of Aussie rules in England anyway. Furthermore the club was founded and folded years before regular use of the internet, so of course it's harder to find mentions of the than some other defunct clubs.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 09:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.