The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that insufficient sources (that are both reliable & independent) exist to show notability Nosebagbear (talk) 15:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanos Dimadis[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It seems that it does not meet WP:GNG. Most sources are brief biographies from RS that give some bites of info on the author of an article. What is needed for an article to meet GNG are the article of RS to discuss the life, career or achievement of the a person. Cinadon36 14:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yeah I think it should be deleted, a quick Google Search about him (excluding Wikipedia, Twitter, and his own websites) gives results that are mostly bios on news websites, and not notable enough. Also he recently used Wikipedia on his twitter to "prove" his educational credentials, which seems fishy to me since this entire article is written as an advertisement. --Michail (blah) 17:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. To repeat my comment on the article talk page, I can see citations to articles written by the subject himself, or to others that mention him as the author of an article or an interviewer, but nothing that is actually about Dimades, and I can find no such sources myself. It would appear that the authors of the article have done their best to find sources that would contribute towards notability, but have come up with none, so I can only conclude that he is not notable. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:19, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Yet another article about a non-notable "political analyst/strategist" with heavy COI editing. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per rationale provided by @Cinadon36:. Ktrimi991 (talk) 12:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 14:40, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.