The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Aetherverse[edit]

The Aetherverse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. New E-book with non-notable authors. Main editor appears to be adding to links/mentions in multiple articles MartinezMD (talk) 03:45, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I am unable to find coverage to show that this book meets WP:GNG or WP:BKCRIT.  gongshow  talk  03:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Nothing to indicate notability is met, as stated. 331dot (talk) 08:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.