The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The information in this article is already included in the article entitled John Tomkins. MDEVER802 (talk) 11:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Maybe even per WP:SNOW. Props to the nominator, who might reasonably have been put off when I screwed up his good faithWP:PROD proposal because it blanked the page. Instead of getting peeved, he sought counsel, followed policy and we wound up here.
On the merits, he's absolutely right. All the relevant data is on the Tomkins page. The Bishop should be deleted and The Bishop should become a redirect to the Tomkins page. David in DC (talk) 15:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.