The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Gatecrashers[edit]

The Gatecrashers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possibly on the way to notability, to meeting WP:GNG, but WP:TOOSOON. The two sources cited are OK starter sources, even if one of them is one writer's personal Top Five list for 2014, but both give the comic only a paragraph, where the sources cover a number of topics each. And I can't find coverage in independent reliable sources via Google to supplement these. Largoplazo (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This has nothing to do with the previous article by the same title, about a wrestling tag team, that was the subject of a deletion discussion. Largoplazo (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 17:07, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.