The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Heart Rate of a Mouse[edit]

The Heart Rate of a Mouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable, non-reliably sourced fan fiction book series that fails both WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. I originally prodded this article a month ago and the prod was removed when the overall plot was split into book plots, a character list was added and four sources were added. The first reference is the livejournal when the books were written and the other three references are goodreads.com that contain a basic plot description and readers' reviews, therefore none of these references are reliable and the article should still be deleted. Aspects (talk) 09:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Books-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The notability guideline for books applies, but I have found no sources that suggest this work is notable. Author currently has no individual article. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 17:05, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Sometimes, very VERY rarely, a fanfiction will become notable enough to warrant an article or even a mention on Wikipedia. It takes an awful lot and most fanfiction never gain that coverage because there's just so many of them. For every Fifty Shades or Beautiful Bastard there are thousands upon thousands of fanfics that never gain any sort of mainstream attention. I can't find anything to show that this series is one of those rare exceptions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, no reliable reviews found. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Clearly not notable, fails WP:GNG, in general, fan fiction is not notable. ThePlatypusofDoom (Talk) 13:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.