The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:33, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The High School Attached to Zhejiang University[edit]

The High School Attached to Zhejiang University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable high school. KDS4444 (talk) 13:00, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:07, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. While I'm personally against the use of SCHOOLOUTCOMES in any discussion, including AfD, it's been used to keep high school articles in the past, as long as the school has been confirmed to exist; this high school is confirmed to exist, so it stays. I would suggest a trip to WP:VPP if you don't like the outcome of this. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:10, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Red X I withdraw my nomination KDS4444 (talk) 02:32, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(@Cordless Larry:, actually, I would much prefer a merge— I just get tired of fighting against the tide, which often seems a lonely and thankless job.) KDS4444 (talk) 10:35, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why not let the discussion run, then, and see if that option has traction? Cordless Larry (talk) 10:39, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • That was my point. I wonder if we could get a more intuitive English name (e.g. Zhejiang University High School). -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:20, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.