The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 22:07, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Lost Legend[edit]

No notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This poorly written thing is barely a stub. Shoester (talk) 21:11, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Sub-stub on film by non-notable company. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per WP:NFF. Schuym1 (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 00:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MADEUP... no independent notability established. —Erik (talk • contrib) 00:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The article is clearly not notable and it should be deleted.--Ped Admi (talk) 04:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your assessment, and I recommend that you bold "deleted" in your message. :) —Erik (talk • contrib) 04:22, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete in agreement with the nom. If/when this film is released and gets coverage of some sort... maybe then. But as of now? No way to source notability. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.