The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 16:28, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The May Day Mystery[edit]

The May Day Mystery (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Prod removed by an anon IP, so officially listing at AFD.) Nothing in the article even tries to establish any sort of notability for a listing on Wikipedia. There are no sources other than a single website by a former student, which clearly does not meet WP:RS criteria. Article has been tagged as unsourced for more than a year with no sources being provided. I just tried to Google up anything that might qualify as a reliable source and there's nothing out there but the original personal site by that former student, mirrors of this Wikipedia page, and minor blog refs to this article or that site. No books, no magazines, no anything remotely resembling a reliable source. Could be a hoax, could be real but completely insignificant, but either way it's not encyclopedia-worthy. DreamGuy (talk) 18:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No Lexis/Nexis hits. Unless someone finds a RS, I'll have to conclude that this is of local interest only. Gamaliel (talk) 19:54, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - a minor curiosity with no coverage in reliables sources -- Whpq (talk) 16:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:RS qualifications seem to be mysteriously elusive. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:45, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.