The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:54, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Music and Art of Radiohead[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources in article, doesn't appear to be a notable work. There are lots of minor books written about Radiohead, this is no different.

Delete - Zero news coverage and no online reviews, at least none that I found. TimothyJosephWood 18:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker ^talk 06:07, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, this afd was started by Popcornduff, just saying, btw great username:) Coolabahapple (talk) 04:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK, it has been reviewed in ARSC Journal and Popular Music magazine, and WorldCat shows it is held in around 250 libraries, not bad for a "minor book written about Radiohead". Coolabahapple (talk) 05:14, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It can definitely be expanded, but there are some reviews out there. It also looks to be referenced in this book, where some of the citations do mention it in detail. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:05, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep I've just expanded the article from 2 extra sources I found quite easily. WP:GNG, WP:NBOOK and WP:BEFORE apply — Iadmc ♫^talk 09:02, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Meets WP:BOOKCRIT per reviews. E.g. [1], [2], [3]. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:59, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.