The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Poetry Trilogy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self-published collection of poetry. The only references are the amazon pages for the books themselves and I could not find any third-party coverage. --Non-Dropframe _talk 09:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Smacks of self-promotion, no evidence of notability. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:17, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Too soon, fails WP:GNG with no reliable third party references available. Theroadislong (talk) 10:24, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Everything in the article in question is true. This is a TRUE article. why does it matter who wrote it or how it's verified? Honestly. Someone has to be the first person to write any truth before it's known to the world. Please look for any FALSE information in this article before it is considered for deletion. Honestly. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AaronLA2012 (talk • contribs) 12:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @AaronLA2012: How can the statement "Not much is known about the author him/herself, his/her age, race, nationality and religious background is still a mystery, but what is known is that the author's claim of having written the largest collection of poetry ever published is thus far undisputed." be true when you claim in this Teahouse question that you are the author of the The Poetry Trilogy? You created this Wikipedia article about a collection of poetry that you claim to have written and yet the article claims that not much is known about the author? I apologize if I am missing something here, but I just don't understand how that can be. What you need to do is show that the article satisfies at least one of Wikipedia's notability criteria for books and is not simply for reasons of self promotion and publicity. - Marchjuly (talk) 15:56, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is about a non-notable self-published trilogy and is written by the poet, who did not understand that Wikipedia is not a vehicle for promotion of books which have not been widely reviewed by reliable, independent sources. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 20:37, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.