The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Prodigal Trilogy[edit]

The Prodigal Trilogy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

No sources, only non-notable people involved. Only one of the five awards is from a notable festival, and even then I don't think that's enough for it to pass muster. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - mostly for winning best dramatic short at the San Antonio Independent Christian Film Festival, but also for this reliable source review: Praise Pictures and these two pieces on Hildebrand: Alliance.ca Christian-movie.com. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep – ThaddeusB has shown some pretty good sources, and it has won many awards at film competitions/festivals. Not over-the-top, but enough for GNG. American Eagle (talk) 03:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep 1) the Prodigal Trilogy is, upon examination, both a play and a film adaptation of that play; Google shows coverage for both the one-man show and the film/DVD. 2) As such, it meets the GNG, and should be kept even if the awards don't rise to the level envisioned by WP:NF. I've added a couple of references and some external links. Jclemens (talk) 05:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.