The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Royal Oak, Monmouth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be an unremarkable pub and this article is more or less an advert for it. After removing a substantial amount of WP:OR from national census returns, and general info about pubs/oaks, the remainder has little evidence of reliable, independent published sources (we have one entry in a book about pubs in the area, and a number of historical directory listings of owners/occupiers). The building itself is not listed, therefore unremarkable too. Fails WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 19:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This was one of the many articles created during the MonmouthPedia/QR exercise, which was a precursor to the much-criticised GibraltarPedia project. - Sitush (talk) 23:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - if it were listed, even only at grade II, I would have some sympathy, but without architectural merit you don't have a reason for keeping it. Le petit fromage (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:46, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - without wider significance outside the local area, and it's not a Listed building. Its claim "[second to] last pub in Wales" apparently means one of the last pubs you'd see leaving Wales due to its proximity to the English border, but that doesn't give it real significance and is pretty incidental. –146.199.151.33 (talk) 15:26, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've looked around and there really is nothing notable about this pub. As said above, something like listed building status would guarantee a keep but it doesn't even have that. - Sitush (talk) 23:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.