The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Ruliad[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page is a synthesis of ideas, citing sources few of of which explicitly name The Ruliad. It is a neologism of the Wolfram Physics project yet to gain acceptance outside a walled garden of researchers. WP:NOPAGE seems relevant here. Klbrain (talk) 15:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is not a term that has gained any currency outside of the Wolfram Physics niche, and even if it had, we wouldn't need an article on it. There isn't even enough reliable, secondary coverage of the Wolfram Physics project as a whole to merit a stand-alone article on it. An article on one part of it is putting the cart way before the horse. XOR'easter (talk) 13:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The meager results that I get from a Google Scholar search, mostly not reliably published, fail to convince me that this is anything more than Wolfram promotionalism and neologism. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (author of the article): I understand that the article is not good as I thought and I agree to the deletion.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.