The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Silverfern Group[edit]

The Silverfern Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP yet another advitorial added by some misguided soul who thinks this is Facebook John from Idegon (talk) 12:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:38, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:38, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I searched several news archives and couldn't find any in-depth independent coverage of this company. Toohool (talk) 05:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Significant coverage in non-English press (ie Execc News Institutional, www.fundresearch.de, Portfolio Institutionell, as cited in the current article). Organization operates at an international level, and is covered by international press, so appears to meet WP:CORP.136.0.98.22 (talk) 08:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)— 136.0.98.22 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• • Comment: None of the three links given by 136.0.98.22 above appear to mention this firm by name. —swpb^{T go beyond} 15:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • The company is mentioned in these articles, as cited on the The Silverfern Group page: [1],[2], [3]136.0.98.189 (talk) 07:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)— 136.0.98.189 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Significant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to passing mentions, routine corporate news, and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.