The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per low participation herein.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Valley (Keshia Chante song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was proposed for deletion which was contested without a reason given. The proposed deletion rational was: "Does meet the notability requirements for songs" Sjrct (talk) 17:33, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I am new to Wiki. I am trying to figure out how to properly create the format for this artists new song. it is officially released tomorrow but news sources are beginning to premiere it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chantesource (talk • contribs) 21:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chantesource, welcome to Wikipedia! Before addressing the question of formatting the article, the question of whether or not the article is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. An article has to meet the notability guidelines for it to be suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Even if something is notable, it might be the case that it is too soon for inclusion as reliable sources are not yet available. Sjrct (talk) 22:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:00, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep As Chantesource says, this song is starting to generate coverage, at least some of which is in WP:RS. See "The+Valley"+Keshia+Chante+#q=%22The+Valley%22+Keshia+Chante&tbm=nws. The reliability of the most common source, Singersroom, is unknown and has the appearance of a niche R&B fan news site, but BET certainly counts as a major third-party site. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:14, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 02:22, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.