The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I've also applied a dusting of salt because of the repeated recreation. Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wild 2[edit]

The Wild 2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is an article about an unverifiable sequel to The Wild. It looks like a hoax; even if it is not, there is no evidence that production has begun on this Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:13, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No proof that it even exists, or that it ever will exist. Hell, I wasn't even aware of the first one until just now. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 20:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless references added. RJFJR (talk) 21:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The name of the article is misleading, because it (almost) coincides with a known comet. Ruslik (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I don't know whether to vote to delete or not. While I can't find anything on it online, I'm pretty certain a trailer for The Wild 2 played in front of Get Smart when I saw it a few weeks ago... there was some trailer for a CGI film about a bunch of wild animals leaving an island on an airplane. If the film in question can be identified and is NOT "The Wild 2" then feel free to place this in the delete column as unconfirmed and WP:CRYSTAL. 23skidoo (talk) 03:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• That might have been Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa. It comes out soon. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 05:50, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as probable hoax, since my one minor concern has been addressed above, that it was another movie advertised. 23skidoo (talk) 21:40, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No reliable coverage of this exists. Either a hoax or misguided crystal-ballery. Steve ^{T • C} 19:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.