The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:30, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The wormhill dragon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence for existence of any place or hill in Sussex called (the) Wormhill. Text appears to be based on the Bignor Hill entry in http://www.sussexarch.org.uk/saaf/dragon.html#main2, which says "Similar legends have been told of ridges around other hills, such as at Wormhill in Derbyshire." My CSD nomination as hoax was removed with comment "Not a hoax. Folklore", but without any comment on the above comment which I had made on the talk page. PamD 18:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete It's not in the Modern Antiquarian, can't find any credible sourcing. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:35, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete can't seem to find reliable independent sources to establish notability. Fails the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 01:55, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG due to lack of WP:RS. Zappa O Mati 02:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.