The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 03:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thief (chess)[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is not based on reliable sources (WP:V) and by extension does not assert notability (WP:N). I could not locate any reliable sources through Google Web or Books. Has been tagged with notability concerns for over a year. Previous AfD was withdrawn on the basis of a review at Chessville. This is a self-published source, so I tried to ascertain if the author, J. Varsoke was an "established expert in his field" (WP:SPS) but could not find any evidence of this. Marasmusine (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per marasmusine Pass A Method talk 12:33, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article mainly just says this software exists. It doesn't say why it is important. The online review is about the same. This just seems to be one of many programs out there. Kitfoxxe (talk) 13:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indication of notability.--Sloane (talk) 02:52, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.